If the trend continues, the number of trackers will continue to increase, making the community even more decentralized, more fault tolerant, and faster to recover from major shutdowns, while making enforcement slower, weaker, and more expensive. The net effect is to cause a temporary disturbance in the distribution of content (like a matter of days maybe, sometimes just hours) and to instantly make it tougher for the authorities to track what’s being downloaded. all the while doing nothing to curb unauthorized downloading. So, the people who want to police content can shut down a big site/popular technology, but then they have to locate the numerous other sites that will take it’s place and then master a new technology. today the ecosystem is made of hundreds of general purpose public trakers, thousands of specialized public trackers and tens of thousands of private trackers. the population stays the same, but now you have more groups to keep an eye on.Ī good example was napster that was replaced by gnutella clones bearshare and limewire, which were replaced by morpheus, kazaa, soulseek, which were ultimately replaced by bittorrent.
#Gigatribe ip address bbw upgrade
every time you shut down a site, you fragment it into two or more smaller pieces and sometimes cause the community to upgrade it’s technology and techniques. Shutting down this site and sites like this doesn’t do much of anything because the content is still out there and people are just gonna use another method to find it.Īctually, it’s worse than that. No matter who is charged and for what, get ready for the next case to watch in the ongoing global game of legal whack-a-mole by the recording industry.įiled Under: bittorrent, copyright, file sharing, lawsuits, music, sweden Torrentfreak suggests that this move is designed to move public sympathy against the site, though until the evidence is presented, it’s difficult to assume anything. Oddly, it seems that part of the strategy isn’t just to go after the folks who run the site, but also one of their employers, who is apparently a politically controversial figure. It seems hard to justify going after the Pirate Bay for anything, and it’s taken Swedish investigators well over a year to come up with charges it can throw at the operators of the site - though it sounds like they won’t be filed for a few months.
The people who are making content available may be breaking copyright law, but simply indexing and pointing people to that content should be perfectly legal. Admittedly, plenty of content you can find from The Pirate Bay is unauthorized, but some of it is perfectly legitimate.
The company doesn’t host any of that content itself. After all, it’s really just a search engine for content. The Swedish investigation, however, has apparently had a tough time figuring out if The Pirate Bay actually breaks any laws.
It only took a little while for the site to come back up, after which traffic shot up in large part thanks to the press attention from the recording industry declaring “victory” over the site being down. While the Pirate Bay has been known for quite some time among many people, the moment that really got them the most attention was when (thanks to pressure from the US) Swedish officials took the site down and began an investigation.
0 kommentar(er)
